19 May

Friday 19th. At 10 oC. went with Dr Bliss to Magd. College,

& called on the Librarn. D.r Chapman, who attended

us to the MS. liby. & gave into my hands the MSS.

No. 12 & 53. The Printed library is by far the

handsomest of all the smaller Colleges, & is preferable

to any in point of situation, & the care taken of it,

in keeping it painted & clean. The President

Dr. Routh desired I would make use of his study

to transcribe in, which I did, & remained there

till 12oC. I collated first the Poem in Whitaker:

Vita S. Neoti, which I find very wretchedly transcribed

in some places; as indeed, the scribe allows. The

original is very fairly written, doub. col. Cent. XIII. & 

bound up with Historical treatises of various ages.

I will only give one instance of the transcriber’s

errors. In Whitaker the poem reads, p. 319.

“Nascitur means et murcas (1), atque Neotus

Nomen ei donant: gaudet uterque parens.”

Note “(1) From the letters here, I suppose the line to have been this:

“Nascitur hic minuens et murcens atque Neotus &c.”

It is a doubt which of the two is more absurd, the

copy, or the emendation. In the MS. itself we have:

“Nascitur hiis infans et masculus; atque Neotus

Nomen ei, &c__________________” !!!

I then turned with eagerness to No. 12. expect~g to

find the long ####looked for treatise on Chess by Abp

^Simon Aylward, as stated by Bale, Hyde, Twiss, and

a

host of others, but what was my disappointment & vexation,

when, instead of an ^unknown treatise by the Abp. I found nothing more

than a copy of Jacobus de Cesulis^or Cessolis, with the four lines

at the end, which so often occur, and at the end the

name of the scribeSymon Aylward. I was quite angry,

to think ^that men with their eyes open, sh.d have fallen

into such absurd errors; when only five ten lines

above was the name of the real author at length.

‘Ego pater Jacobus de Cessolis“, &c. as usual. It is

also a very badinferior copy of this common MS. The first

chapter has been cut out, for the sake of the border.

On my return to the Bodln. Dr Bliss #### went with me

to the Vice-Chancellor, Dr Jenkins, of Balliol College (who had very politely stated he shdshould

be happy to show me the ^matrix of the seal) & examined the seal

itself, on which the legend is too plain to leave any

doubt of my reading being right. The Vice Chancellouror

expressed himself extremely obliged to me, & promised to

shew me a separate seal of Devorguilla they possess, but

which is at present under 3 keys, so ##could not be got at.

This oldoriginal seal of Bailliol coll. is not the one they use at

present (much to the regret of the ViceC. & indeed of every

man of taste) #for in its place has been substituted one

of the most blackguard things, both in design and exe=

cution, I ever beheld! A woman leaning on an anchor,

or wheel (I forget which) with a drawn sword in her hand!

There never was any thing so bad! It is a disgrace to the

College. The Vice C. wishes to restore the oldoriginal seal, if it can

be done without the interference of the Heralds College.

The oldmatrix of this Seal itself, washad been totally neglected & filled with dirt

but the Vice C.r cleaned it with vitriol, & it is certainly

one of the handsomest I ever saw. Rawlinson got to=

gether a great number of old Covent. Seals (the matrices,

not impressions) which I have seen at the Bodln. liby,

but there is ^among them nothing comparable to this. Bliss asked the

ViceC.

for an impression ^of the Seal & intends to have an engraving

of it by Blore. Dined with Bliss, & having determined

to go to town tomorrow, took a seat on the Coach. D.r

Bliss sends by me to town a parcel (a pedigree of

his wife’s family (Bell) for the purpose of asserting the right           

of Founder’s kin to New Coll.), to ^Charles Geo. Young, ###York Herald, which

will serve the purpose of an introduction ^for me at the

Herald’s College.— Packed up my things,– but my boxes

of Books I leave behind.

<< 18 May

20 May >>

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply